Poli Alert Politics & Civics
Related Articles
The U.S. State Department has ordered embassies and consulates worldwide to resume issuing student and exchange visas to individuals attending Harvard University, following a federal court’s decision to block the Trump administration’s latest travel restrictions.
The directive, issued Friday and signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, came in response to a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued by U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, which halted enforcement of President Trump’s proclamation barring international students from enrolling at the prestigious institution.
“Effective immediately, consular sections must resume processing of Harvard University student and exchange visitor visas,” the department stated in an official diplomatic cable. “No such applications should be refused.”
This marks a reversal of guidance issued earlier in the week, in which U.S. diplomatic posts had been instructed to deny visa applications for international students and researchers affiliated with Harvard.
Legal Battle Over Trump’s Harvard Ban
The reversal underscores the growing legal challenges to Trump’s recent immigration orders, particularly those that have targeted academic institutions with significant international student populations.
Judge Burroughs, who issued the TRO on Thursday, expressed concern that international students accepted to Harvard were unable to obtain visas in recent weeks due to State Department enforcement of the ban.
“We are closely watching whether U.S. embassies comply fully with this ruling,” Burroughs said during a hearing, noting that further court action may be warranted if visa processing delays continue.
Harvard’s legal team told the court that students abroad had experienced confusion and obstacles while trying to schedule interviews or receive visa appointments, despite holding valid I-20 documentation from the university.
Background on the Proclamation
The now-halted presidential proclamation was part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to limit academic visas, especially for students from countries facing other travel or immigration restrictions. While the administration claimed the policy was based on “security concerns,” it appeared to target Harvard uniquely, raising questions of political motivation.
Legal experts and university officials argued that the proclamation violated administrative law and undermined the educational and diplomatic mission of U.S. universities.
Ongoing Legal Proceedings
Though the TRO restores the status quo for Harvard’s international students, the broader legal case is far from over. Another major court hearing is scheduled for next week, where Judge Burroughs is expected to review further evidence from both sides.
In the meantime, the State Department has committed to following the court’s order and has instructed all consular officials to treat Harvard visa applications as they would under normal conditions.
Higher Education Community Reacts
The decision was welcomed by Harvard and other universities concerned about the chilling effect of Trump-era immigration restrictions.
“This is an important step toward ensuring that Harvard remains open to the world’s brightest minds,” said a spokesperson for the university. “We will continue to fight for our students’ right to learn and thrive in the U.S.”
Educational and civil liberties organizations have also praised the court’s intervention, calling the administration’s attempt to single out a specific university for immigration denial “unprecedented and unconstitutional.”
As legal challenges to Trump’s immigration policies continue to unfold, this case is expected to have significant implications for how far the federal government can go in restricting access to American higher education.
