Judge Orders Continued Halt to Trump’s $1.8 Billion “anti-weaponization” Fund

A federal judge on Friday extended a court order blocking the Trump administration from creating and operating a proposed $1.8 billion compensation fund designed to provide payments to individuals who claim they were harmed by what President Donald Trump and his allies describe as a “weaponized” federal government.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that the administration’s proposed “Anti-Weaponization Fund” must remain frozen while legal challenges continue, rejecting efforts to dismiss lawsuits against the program based solely on assurances that the administration no longer intends to move forward with it.

The decision follows testimony earlier this month from Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who told Congress the administration had abandoned plans for the fund after encountering bipartisan opposition from lawmakers.

Government attorneys argued that the lawsuits challenging the fund should be dismissed because the program is no longer moving forward. However, attorneys representing the plaintiffs said verbal assurances were insufficient, noting that President Trump has not publicly and unequivocally renounced the proposal.

In her ruling, Brinkema ordered that the fund remain blocked until further notice and directed both sides to spend the next week negotiating an agreement under which Blanche would submit a sworn declaration affirming that the administration will not revive the program.

The judge’s previous temporary injunction, issued on May 29, was set to expire Friday. Her latest order effectively extends the freeze while the court evaluates whether additional legal safeguards are necessary.

Fund Faced Bipartisan Criticism

The proposed fund became a flashpoint in Washington after critics argued it would allow the federal government to divert taxpayer money toward compensating political allies of the president.

The Trump administration established the fund as part of efforts related to Trump’s lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the unauthorized disclosure of his tax returns.

Supporters of the proposal argued that individuals harmed by politically motivated government actions deserved compensation. Critics, however, described the fund as an unlawful use of public money and questioned whether the executive branch had the authority to create such a program without congressional approval.

Plaintiffs who filed suit to block the fund contend it amounts to an illegal “slush fund” that could benefit individuals selected by the administration without adequate oversight.

Future of Fund Remains Unclear

Although Blanche has indicated the administration no longer plans to pursue the fund, legal challengers remain concerned that the proposal could be revived at a later date absent a binding commitment.

The court’s request for a sworn declaration reflects those concerns and could become a key factor in determining whether the lawsuits remain active.

The case also highlights ongoing tensions between the administration and its critics over efforts to address claims that federal law enforcement and government agencies were used for political purposes.

For now, the $1.8 billion fund remains blocked, and the administration faces additional scrutiny as the legal battle continues.

J. Williams

J. Williams (Jimmy Williams) is the editor of Poli Alert, where he leads coverage of Congress, the White House, the courts and the elections shaping communities across the country. A graduate of Coppin State University in Maryland, he has spent years as a writer and social media manager for multiple outlets. His focus is breaking political news down in plain language so readers know exactly what is happening and how it affects them. Reach him at [email protected].

See Full Bio