Poli Alert Politics & Civics
Related Articles
The New York judge overseeing President-elect Donald Trump’s hush money case has denied his request to vacate a guilty verdict, ruling that presidential immunity does not apply to the charges against him.
Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Trump’s trial earlier this year, wrote in his ruling, “Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment and verdict is denied.” He also rejected Trump’s argument that his election victory shields him from criminal accountability, stating, “This court does not agree.”
Trump was convicted in May on 34 counts of falsifying business records tied to a $130,000 hush money payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in the final days of the 2016 presidential campaign. Daniels alleged an affair with Trump in 2006, which he has denied.
Trump’s legal team argued that the verdict should be vacated based on a recent Supreme Court ruling that expanded presidential immunity. The ruling, issued after the trial, clarified the scope of protections for presidential actions. Trump’s attorneys claimed the Manhattan District Attorney’s office improperly introduced evidence, including public statements by Trump, that should be covered under this immunity.
Prosecutors pushed back, asserting that the evidence had no bearing on the jury’s decision. Judge Merchan agreed, writing, “The jury’s verdict was based on the falsification of business records, not on any official acts or statements.”
The Manhattan District Attorney’s office expressed satisfaction with the decision, noting it reinforces the principle that no one is above the law.
The case marks the first time a U.S. president-elect has been convicted of criminal charges. Trump has denied all allegations and vowed to appeal. His spokesperson released a brief statement, calling the ruling “part of an ongoing witch hunt” and reaffirming Trump’s commitment to “fight for justice.”
Implications for Trump’s Presidency
This ruling complicates Trump’s return to the White House, as he now faces the dual challenge of leading the country while navigating ongoing legal battles.
Legal analysts predict an appeal could drag the case out for months or years, adding uncertainty to the early days of Trump’s presidency.
